Blogs for Bush blogs What is being reported now both on al-Jazeera (no links to hate sites) and Newsmax, is that Senator Kerry will bring the issue up on Monday in the Senate. Failed presidential candidate John Kerry said Thursday that he intends to confront Congress with a document touted by critics of President Bush as evidence that he committed impeachable crimes by falsifying evidence of weapons of mass destruction in Iraq."When I go back [to Washington] on Monday, I am going to raise the issue," Kerry said, referring to the Downing Street Memo in an interview with Massachusetts' Standard Times newspaper.
This is the same Senator Kerry who was on the intelligence committee, saw the same intelligence data the President saw, and voted for the liberation which President Bush advocated...though, as we know, he was for the war before he was against it. Up until now, the demand for an impeachment of President Bush has been confined to the fever swamps of the left...but as the fever swamps of the left have gained control of the Democratic Party via goups like MoveOn, we've seen ever more Democrats acting entirely irreponsibly. It has been a long term goal of the left to impeach President Bush...and now here comes John Kerry, still smarting from his trouncing at the polls, to feed the fires of the fever swamps. This is not a bolt from the blue from John Kerry, however...as we reported earlier, Kerry was saying in mid-April that the intelligence data was manipulated to support the liberation. Kerry lacked any proof then to make such a claim, but he still made it...he still lacks proof, but he and the rest of the left think that the Downing Street Memo will be all they need to bring down a President.
PoliPundit is running a poll:John Kerry’s attempt to impeach President Bush means:
Right now, "All of the above" is ahead with 75% of the votes.
Saturday, June 04, 2005
Impeachment
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
Well, look at the objective facts:
Former treasury secretary Paul O'Neil, former terrorism zcar Richard Clarke and serveral others all TESTIFIED -- under OATH -- that Bush and co. were talking about regime change before 9/11 and that after it, they focus almost immediately on Iraq -- even though we knew the terrorists were (mostly) Saudi and trained in Afghanistan.
Did Bush or Cheney TESTIFY in the 9/11 hearings? No… they ‘chatted behind closed doors’.
The British memo’s clearly show the intentions of the administration to gather evidence to support going to war (i.e. “fixing the facts around the policy” – that’s exactly what that means…).
We know that Cheney, Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz and others were/are all members of the Project for a New American Century – which advocated (during the ‘90s) the use of American military might to reshape the middle east.
If you can’t see that they got the excuse they needed in 9/11… and masterfully played bate and switch… well, I don’t know what evidence will convince you that this administration was looking for any excuse to use our military to overthrow Saddam’s regime.
The British memo was contradicted by another memo that surfaced from Britain writen about the same time. Talking about regime change, and going to war to accomplish it, are two different matters.
Post a Comment