- Sen. Tom Coburn
- Rep. Tom Feeney
- Rep. Scott Garrett
This will be something to keep an eye on.
Note this is ONE OF the plans the Pentagon provided. This does not mean we are going to do it tomorrow. Next month, maybe. We need to wait for El Baradei to leave. <grin>as presented to the White House by the Pentagon this winter, calls for the use of a bunker-buster tactical nuclear weapon, such as the B61-11, against underground nuclear sites. One target is Iran's main centrifuge plant, at Natanz, nearly two hundred miles south of Tehran. Natanz, which is no longer under I.A.E.A. safeguards, reportedly has underground floor space to hold fifty thousand centrifuges, and laboratories and workspaces buried approximately seventy-five feet beneath the surface.
The truth is that the administration of George Bush has never wanted a diplomatic solution to the Iranian nuclear crisis, at least not one short of complete capitulation by the Iranians, something that no analyst believes can or will happen.
If something less than capitulation, how many nukes do you think Iran should have? How many would it take for them to "wipe Israel off the map" as their President has indicated his intent is?The Iraq war has certainly given pause to Mr. Bush and the neo-cons in and around his administration who want a piece of the Mullahs, but perversely as the situation deteriorates in Baghdad, it seems that Tehran is beginning to look like a good diversion. The IAEA chief, Mohammad El Baradei, despite U.S. urgings to the contrary, is visiting Iran next week to meet with Iranian leaders, still hoping to salvage a compromise deal. The U.S. would hardly object to Mr. El Baradei's trip unless it wants all options to fail so that the one option left (which we constantly remind the Iranians is still on the table, not getting stale) will be war.
Wwhich is a good ideathe horrors of Abu Ghraib
which everyone deplored, rendition,
which is legalillegal detentions,
which were not ilegalthe Valerie Plame leak,
which has not been proven yetand most recently illegal wiretaps on U.S. citizens.
which were legalWe're sleeping and shopping through administration claims that Iran is building weapons of mass destruction,
who does not believe they arethe preposterous claim that Iran is supplying their Sunni arch-enemies al Qaeda with arms and bombs,
Maybe they are providing them to their Shi'ia buddiesthat Iran is the world's foremost sponsor of terrorism,
It is. Do you really think Syria does more?and that Iran, if allowed the technology to manufacture nuclear fuel, will not only make nuclear weapons but use them against us or our allies (or just hand them over to terrorists who will).
Or all of the above.No proof required, and hey, there's a sale on at Saks! Preposterous claims eh? Maybe leftard pacifists are gullible enough to to believe a extreme theocratic nation that isn't shy about its hatred of America, and loudly proclaimed that Israel should be wiped off the map, are only seeking nuclear capabilities for peaceful purposes. Perhaps they are naive enough to put all hope in diplomacy working with radical leaders that believe they are ushering in the Muslim messiah to rule the entire world under Islamic rule. I'm sure they have complete faith in Russia and China as well. However, some of us don't feel so comfortable.
I have NO FAITH in the UN or the international community. They are paralyzed by corruption, moral inversion, and unending discourse. If they can't save lives in Darfur, an unambiguous case of genocide, Iran is far far beyond their grasp. America must save the world, from itself, yet again. We need our peeps, our crew, our coalition - trusted allies that share our values, to get anything done.Amen to that Pamela. One thing the lefties are correct about is that America needs to wake up, but it isn't like they think. I for one, am glad that we have every option on the table right now. If it takes a few bunker buster nukes to penetrate where Iran is hiding their nuclear experiments, then by all means use them. The left crying like we are talking about another Hiroshima is not only an overexaggeration, but very revealing. Sadly, we can already see who the lefties will be rooting for. To the left, the real enemy is not radical extremists getting their hands on nuclear weapons! To them, the enemy is President Bush. We are pursuing diplomaticly, but it doesn't hurt to have a plan B. If it ends up that Iran keeps playing games with us, and refusing to cooperate with the international community; and when the international community once again shows its uneffectiveness in dealing with the situation; its good to know we've got a plan in place to deal with ourself. And if it ends up that we can't find anything afterwards, the only people to blame will be Iran. They are digging their own graves, and if they don't wake up out of their little apocolypse dream, we will have to give them a wake-up call.
In private as well as public, Reid and Sen. Charles Schumer, D-N.Y., who heads the party's campaign effort, said they did not want to expose rank-and-file Democrats to votes that would force them to choose between border security and immigrant rights, only to wind up with legislation that would be eviscerated in future negotiations with the House, which has passed a bill limited to boosting border security.That explains it. I thought they were just being Democrats, opposing everything, even though the "compromise" was almost a complete surrender to them.
Based on what happened to me in Memphis, I think its time for Americans to wake up as to what is occurring within their very midst. It is time to be energized and empowered to stand up and fight to take back our universities. Its incidents like this that spurs speakers like me to defend our civilization and everything it stands for.Have we really reached the point when radical Islamicists at a university in the United States can try to prevent someone from speaking with a message condemning jihad and the murder of innocents in the name of Allah? If so, we have truly reached a sorry state.
We need to encourage more Moderate Muslims like her to speak up. If they do not speak up, people are going to assume that all Muslims are like the Islamoterrorists, and if that happens it will be hard to stop people from insisting we wipe all of the off the face of the earth.
Trembling in fear. That is a very good point. I suspect that is why the Moderate Muslims are not speaking out. But they should, because their faith is being hijacked. Early Christians were persecuted for their faith, and many died as Martyrs, but they persisted in defending their beliefs, and so should the Moderate Muslims, because their faith in particular offers a major reward for Martyrs who die in support of Islam, and I guarantee them that this is what Allah was talking about, and not guys that blow themselves up or set off IEDs, just to kill a few innocents. In fact the Quran specifically says what will happen to those idiots: Surat an-Nisa,093 (Quran 4.93) says "If a man kills a believer intentionally, his recompense is Hell, to abide therein (For ever): And the wrath and the curse of Allah are upon him, and a dreadful penalty is prepared for him."Where are all the Muslim moderates? Where are those who oppose terrorism, religious wars, hatred and intolerance? Where are those who think it crazy to attempt to recreate the 8th century in the 21st century? Where are those who want not to destroy the Free World but to join it? They are out there, I suspect; in larger numbers than we might be led to believe. But if most are silent and fearful of speaking out, can you blame them? The vast majority of Arabs and Muslims live in countries ruled by illiberal and oppressive regimes.
But if Moderate Muslims here in the US, and in Europe, would speak up, the word would get back to those oppressed Muslims. They might not overturn their regimes immediately, but they would hear the truth. That is better than just hearing lies.And in the few relatively free countries – Bangladesh, Malaysia, Indonesia – there is no protection from the long arm of Militant Islamism. Indeed, even in Europe it can be dangerous to challenge religious fascism.
But it can be even more dangerous NOT to challenge it.And last year, Shaker Elsayed, leader of Dar al-Hijrah, one of the largest mosques in the U.S., told American Muslims: "The call to reform Islam is an alien call."
I hope he was deported, and if not, that he will be deported.Muslims who dissent from this orthodoxy have received precious little support from anyone.
We should all praise them, and do our best to spread their word.As far back as 1989, Iranian Ayatollah Khomeini called for the murder of British author Salman Rushdie. Such a frontal attack on freedom of speech should have prompted Western governments to send Iranian diplomats packing. Instead, Rushdie went into hiding while most Western intellectuals persuaded themselves this quarrel was none of their business. Since that time, and perhaps partly as a consequence, Dutch filmmaker Theo Van Gogh was murdered for making a movie some Muslims found insulting. Danish journalists who dared publish cartoons satirizing the radicalization of Islam have been threatened. Such formerly-courageous publications as The New York Times declined to publish the cartoons, claiming – unconvincingly -- that they had not been intimidated; they were merely demonstrating sensitivity.
They were sensitive to having their editors killed and their building burned down..... If we in the West ever want to have allies in Arab and Muslim countries, we'll need to start supporting moderates -- and stop empowering their oppressors.
Amen to that.Most immediately, it would be useful if American ambassadors in Muslim countries would welcome dissidents to their offices as they do cabinet ministers.
And maybe helped some of them get asylmn in our country, where they could speak out.And perhaps Columbia University President Lee Bollinger – whose “primary teaching and scholarly interests are focused on free speech and First Amendment issues” -- might recognize how his institution has been compromised and at least express concern.
And maybe even Yale could send their Taliban student to Gitmo, and let a Moderate Muslim take his place
This is very interesting. But why just do it in San Francisco and Mountain View. What about other cities like Tulsa.The leading internet search company, which depends on advertising for 99 per cent of its revenues, was selected on Wednesday by San Francisco as its preferred bidder to provide a basic free wi-fi internet service covering the entire city. Google and Earthlink will now enter final contract negotiations with the city. There were five other bidders including a non-profit group backed by Cisco Systems and IBM.
Why don't the four that lost the bid try for doing it in some other citiesThe company hopes to defray the costs of offering a free service through contextual advertising. Analysts have speculated that the San Francisco bid could be a prelude to Google seeking to extend its reach into localities nationwide.
I hope that is the case.
AbsolutelyForget employer sanctions. Build a barrier. It is simply ridiculous to say it cannot be done. If one fence won't do it, then build a second 100 yards behind it. And then build a road for patrols in between. Put in cameras. Put in sensors. Put out lots of patrols.
The only thing I would do to improve on that is to suspend Posse Comitatus in an area 10 miles from the border, and assign the military on training missions to help defend the border, and at the same time learn skills that would be ideal in Iraq and Afganistan, where they want to close borders to prevent terrorists from crossing them.Can't be done? Israel's border fence has been extraordinarily successful in keeping out potential infiltrators who are far more determined than mere immigrants. Nor have very many North Koreans crossed into South Korea in the past 50 years.
Absolutely.Of course, no barrier will be foolproof. But it doesn't have to be. It simply has to reduce the river of illegals to a manageable trickle. Once we can do that, everything becomes possible -- most especially, humanizing the situation of our 11 million illegals.
And it should reduce a lot of drug traffic and middle east people from getting in to our country.If the government can demonstrate that it can control future immigration, there will be infinitely less resistance to dealing generously with the residual population of past immigration.
Right. Stack the court in favor of immigration.The second nasty surprise? Just before the committee approved the bill on the evening of March 27, Sen. Richard Durbin (D-Ill.) offered the "DREAM Act" as an amendment. It passed on a voice vote. The DREAM Act is a nightmare. It repeals a 1996 law that prohibits state universities from offering in-state tuition rates to illegal aliens. The principle, of course, is that no illegal alien should be entitled to receive a taxpayer-subsidized benefit that out-of-state U.S. citizens can't get. But the committee's bill allows illegals to be treated better than those U.S. citizens on tuition. The bill also gives an amnesty to the nine states (including New York) that have been flouting the '96 law, two of which (California and Kansas) are now facing lawsuits (I'm a counsel to the plaintiffs in both cases).
Another reason why the entire bill should be scrapped.The third nasty surprise lies in what the bill fails to do. The measure envisions a massive amnesty for illegal aliens now in the country - but doesn't give the Citizenship and Immigration Service (CIS) the personnel or infrastructure to implement the amnesty.
I don't like those ammendments, which apparently got in the bill, but I do like S.AMDT.3215 to S.2454 To demonstrate respect for legal immigration by prohibiting the implementation of a new alien guest worker program until the Secretary of Homeland Security certifies to the President and the Congress that the borders of the United States are reasonably sealed and secured.
This is wonderful news. Hopefully the plan will fail altogether, and we won't run the risk of a House/Senate conference committee. The borders must be sealed before any discussion of citizenship. I propose a secure ID card with photo, fingerprint, and other biometric data, available at cost to those outside our borders, and with cost + $2000 to people in the US, repeal Posse Comitatas within 10 miles of the border and station the military there on training missions to learn how to seal the border (skills that would be very valuable in Iraq and Afganistan), and funds appropriated to build a fence (but that could be used on hitech virtual fence tools if the military decided they were more effectiveBetsy Newmark blogged The solution that the Senate came up with yesterday on immigration is so delusional. The idea that there can be some sort of documentation that will be fraud-proof to show if people have been here for more than five years is a joke. The Congress shouldn't pass a law that will clearly be broken. And this bill does nothing to address the problem of the new illegal immigrants who will come in every day.
Why just a fine? Isn't it a criminal matter?Senate Minority Leader Harry ReidAnd when it comes to cashing in on family connections, DeLay's relatives can't hold a candle to Reid's family. In June, 2003, the Los Angeles Times reported that in the prior four years firms employing Reid's sons or sons-in-law earned more than $2 million in lobbying fees from special interests that were represented by the kids and helped by the senator in Washington.....
The Democratic version of Family Values.Sen. Hillary Clinton The 2000 campaign of Sen. Hillary Clinton, who would be our president, recently conceded filing false FEC reports, understating in-kind contributions by nearly $722,000, including those of three-time convicted felon Peter Paul.
OopsJack Abramoff As we have noted, Reid got $70,000 from sources linked to lobbyist Jack Abramoff, whom Democrats tried to hang around DeLay's neck like a political albatross. John Kerry got $100,000, and Senate campaign committee chief Chuck Schumer got nearly $30,000. Schumer in 2003 quietly paid a $130,000 fine plus $120,000 in refunds to 77 donors for violations in his 1998 campaign.
Abramoff was an equal opportunity briber. The only reason Republicans got more than Democrats is that they were the party in power.An analysis by the nonpartisan Center for Responsive Politics shows that since 1990, Democrats have taken in nearly 10% more in campaign contributions from lobbyists. In 2005, the GOP received 55% of lobbyist contributions, but in the 1990s during the Clinton administration, Democrats got 70%.
Of course African American voters are likely to support an African American who makes good sense, and has shown he can get results.and advises the party not to wait to "knock Steele down."
In other words if you can't come up with ideas as good as Steele's, knock him down some other way. Call him names. Lie about him. Use all possible Democratic techniques to knock him down.The 37-page report says a sizable segment of likely black voters -- as much as 44 percent -- would readily abandon their historic Democratic allegiances "after hearing Steele's messaging."
The Democratic Party not be able to count on blacks voting for it automatically? Why the party might have to come up with some real ideas if the want to win elections."Governor Ehrlich and [Lt. Gov.] Michael Steele have a clear ability to break through the Democratic stronghold among African American voters in Maryland," says the March 27 report by Cornell Belcher, polling consultant for the Democratic National Committee, which bases its findings on a survey of 489 black voters in Maryland conducted last month.
Good luck guys
Did she regretand offered an apology to the House. "There should not have been any physical contact in this incident,"
- Hitting the cop,
- Calling several press conferences to accuse the cop of "improper touching" and racism, or
- The fact that the case has been turned over to a Grand Jury, and that she may be indited for a crime.
Does that mean he should not have stopped her, or that she should not have hit him?McKinney said in brief remarks on the House floor. "I am sorry that this misunderstanding happened at all
What misunderstanding. Did she wear the proper button to allow her to bypass security?and I regret its escalation
What excalation: her calling news conferences, or it being submitted to the Grand Jury?and I apologize."
He had no problem when they criticized Jews or Christians, but when they targeted his faith, Scientology, he was upset. Heck, just about everyone but Tom Cruise makes fun of Scientology.some CQ readers noted that Matt Stone and Trey Parker had never taken on Muslims. Actually, Mohammed made an appearance in the "Super Best Friends" episode, where Big Mo teamed up with Moses, Jesus, Buddha, Joseph Smith, and Sea Man to stop a giant stone Abraham Lincoln -- by creating a giant stone John Wilkes Booth. They also skewered al-Qaeda in an episode where the boys go to Afghanistan to return a goat sent to them by four boys who received their one-dollar donation.
Of course they would take an additional shot at Fox.but that doesn't stop Family Guy from trying again. In the first installment of a supposed two-parter, the two manage to satirize the ultrasensitive multiculturalists, the scolds of the mainstream media, and Comedy Central for pulling their "Trapped In The Closet" episode from their normal repeat cycle. I suspect that the gag will be that the second half will never air.
It is going to take more than this one episode, but I am certainly willing to add my post to their praise in the blogosphere for this effort.The Anchoress agrees, even though the last episode of last season ("Bloody Mary") offended her enough for her to shut off the television. Too bad everyone doesn't understand how to react when something offends you ...
The Captain is exactly correct. If something offends you, don't watch it. Don't riot in the street, don't kill anyone, don't burn down any embassies; just don't watch it.
If you changed your hairdo, making it less likely they would recognize you, then you had even more reason to wear the pin you are required to wear, to identify yourself as a member of Congress. Either that, or go through security, like everyone else.and that 250 black officers sued the Capitol Police for racial discrimination.
What does that have to do with whether or not you were wearing your pin, and why you hit a police officer?
If they are smart, they will demand such programs, and vote for the Republicans who are offerring these vouchers, and not the Dems, who just want to protect the failing public school system
I don't have any children, but if I did, I think this would be ideal.On Wednesday, the company will introduce a wireless phone service that will allow parents to set limits on their children's cellphone use as well as track them on a map using Global Positioning System technology.
Do you know where your children are?Parents can determine what hours and days of the week children can use phones, blocking school hours for example,
This is goodand what numbers they can dial.
This is very goodThey will also be able to set spending limits on their phone bills.
This is fantastic
If you don't like an amendment, vote against it."It hurts the bill," said Minority Leader Harry Reid of Nevada. "It hurts the very foundation and what I believe is the spirit" of the legislation.
The Democratic spirit being to make all criminals citizens so that they can vote for other criminals (i.e. Democrats)
What about border security? Before they even consider making any of the illegals citizens they should build a secure fence, repeal posse comitatas within 10 miles of the border, and station the military there for training, so they can learn how to close borders; something they need i both Iraq and Afganistan.As outlined by Senate Republicans late Wednesday, the compromise would place illegal immigrants in three categories:
There should be no guarantee of citizenship, and if they have a criminal record there should not be any way of getting citizenship.The aide said this group accounted for about 7 million of the roughly 11 million illegal immigrants believed to be living here.
They should be given an unforgable ID card with photo, fingerprints, and other bio data, and a dna swap should be taken. If they have a criminal record they should not be readmitted.
They do it by saying everyone has to get health insurance.The bill does what health experts say no other state has yet been able to do: provide a mechanism for all of its citizens to obtain health insurance. It accomplishes that in a way that experts say combines several different methods and proposals from across the political spectrum, apportioning the cost among businesses, individuals and the government.
So the government decides how individuals and businesses must spend their money."This is probably about as close as you can get to universal," said Paul Ginsburg, an economist who is president of the nonpartisan Center for Studying Health System Change in Washington. "It's definitely going to be inspiring to other states about how there was this compromise. They found a way to get to a major expansion of coverage that people could agree on. For a conservative Republican, this is individual responsibility. For a Democrat, this is government helping those that need help."
I know how we can save NASA a lot of money. Let's just pass a law requiring everyone to be able to fly in space.Individuals who can afford private insurance will be penalized on their state income taxes if they do not buy it.
And it will be the government that decides whether you can afford it or not.Government subsidies to private insurance plans will enable more of the working poor to be able to afford insurance and will expand the number of children who are eligible for free coverage.
More free health care for Democratic voters, and force the Republicans to buy it themselves.And businesses with more than 10 workers that do not provide insurance will be assessed a fee of up to $295 per employee per year.
It does not matter whether they can afford to buy health care for their employees or not. I bet we find a lot of small businesses with 10 to 20 part time workers firing half their staff and having nine employees working overtime.
Since when did he ever have a political role? Was he on the ballot in the last Iraqi election?"Zarqawi's role has been limited to military action," said Azzam, whose late father Abdallah Azzam was the mentor of bin Laden, the Al-Qaeda boss.
But he is afraid to actually battle with the military. They have guns, and can shoot back."Zarqawi bowed to the orders two weeks ago and was replaced by Iraqi national Abdullah bin Rashed al-Baghdadi," Azzam said.
Is he going to hide like Zarqawi did?Azzam, 35, whose father was known as the "prince of mujahedeens", said he regularly receives "credible information on the resistance in Iraq".
So should Azzam be arrested as a collaberator?He said Zarqawi "made many political mistakes", including "the creation of an independent organisation, Al-Qaeda in Iraq".
And a majority of them don't want the resistance to continue.As a result "the resistance command inside and outside Iraq, including imams, criticised him and after long discussions demanded that he be confined to military action", Azzam said.
How about confining him to prison instead."Zarqawi pledged not to carry out any more attacks against Iraq's neighbours
Yes, his family is now against him after he bombed the wedding party in Jordan.after having been criticised for these operations which are considered a violation of sharia (Islamic law)," Azzam said.
Actually his attacks which kill innocent Iraqis are in violation of Quran 4.93 which says "If a man kills a believer intentionally, his recompense is Hell, to abide therein (For ever): And the wrath and the curse of Allah are upon him, and a dreadful penalty is prepared for him."
It's about timeTwo women are also among eight candidates running for the seat in the Salmiya district, south of the capital.
You go, girl.The 28,000 eligible voters, 60% of whom are women, are voting in segregated polling booths, a condition demanded by Islamist and tribal MPs.
Does it frighten the men to see women voting, or are they worried that someone might do something naughty with them in a public polling place?
What are they going to do? Allow an answer of 3, 4, or 5 to the question "What is 2+2"?The Justice Department claimed that the test’s pass-fail system had a disproportionate effect on minorities because the passing rates for blacks and Hispanics were less than 80 percent of the passing rate for whites.
It would seem that the proper solution is to tell the schools to stop wasting time trying to brainwash people into thinking like liberals, and teach them some actual math (along with being able to read and write)From 2002 to mid-2005, about 85 percent of white applicants passed the math exam, compared with 59 percent of blacks and 66 percent of Hispanics.
Could the blacks and Hispanics do the necessary calculations to come up with the percentages?Under the old standard, Virginia Beach required all recruits to score 70 percent on each of three written tests for reading comprehension, grammar and spelling, and math.
When I went to school, a grade of 70 was a C Minus (just barely above a D)The Justice Department questioned whether math is relevant to the daily duties of a police officer.
If it is not, why test them on it at all? But if it is important, then why not require them to know it?The city agreed to eliminate the 70 percent cutoff score for the math part of the test.
They are looking for men who actually "look Muslim". They want a guy with no foreign accent whatsoever, a good thick beard, an outgoing personality, and someone willing to wear a kufi/skullcap....
So they should ""look Muslim" but not sound MuslimThey also want someone who is fairly well accomplished and has contributed to American society at large in some meaningful way....
It will make it a better story if they can get racist behaviour against someone that has contributed to American society. So they probably don't want a Taliban student from Yale.NBC is willing to fly in someone and cover their weekend expenses....
Free trip if you will help us stage an incident.We already have a hijabi sister who will be filmed there but a Muslim is also needed to join her....
Because doesn't Islamic law mean a woman must stay home unless accompanied by a brother or husband?Catch that? The apparent "sting" involves targeting Nascar and other sporting events. 'Cause that's presumably where the fair and balanced NBC news staff thinks all the bigots are.
That is primarilly because the Secular Humanists control the Democratic PartyBetsy Newmark blogged I happen to be one conservative who is not religious in the slightest, but I have the deepest respect for those who have a strong faith. I think Phillips' whole premise is hogwash. Certainly, there are conservatives whose political views are guided by their religious values. But I think that our history has always had people whose political beliefs were shaped by their faith. Read the founders on their writings about mankind's inalienable rights. Where do you think they thought those rights came from? Even Thomas Jefferson, held up as the oracle on separation of church and state, believed that those rights came from the Creator. Read the Declaration of Independence again.
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of HappinessSome of the people most admired today for their work on reforming our country whether it was ending slavery or rights for women were religious people whose desire to help others stemmed from their faith.
Just tell them that for every terror act, we would take out one of their leading clerics, who control the country, and who keep the country from going democratic.Iran would mount attacks against U.S. targets inside Iraq, where Iranian intelligence agents are already plentiful, predicted these experts. There is also a growing consensus that Iran's agents would target civilians in the United States, Europe and elsewhere, they said.
Also we will take out one of their nuclear sites for every attacks. They are buried too deep to bomb, you say? Well if they want nuclear weapons, then give them one for each nuclear site. I bet that would go deep enough to eliminate it.