tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10623297.post113373642107506002..comments2023-11-17T06:40:12.183-06:00Comments on Don Singleton: Intelligent Design Might Be Meeting Its MakerUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10623297.post-1133791664134603852005-12-05T08:07:00.000-06:002005-12-05T08:07:00.000-06:00Over my years of experience as a university profes...<I>Over my years of experience as a university professor engaged in teaching and research, I have come to the realization that the Evolutionists are right about one thing. Creation Science is religiously based, and teaching young-earth, six-day creationism in the public school system is bringing religious ideas into the classroom.</I><BR/><BR/><B>You are correct that Creation Science is religiously based. So is ID, and so is Evolution.<BR/><BR/>Creation Science, or Creationism is based on the position that the story in Genesis is literally true.<BR/><BR/>Evolution, as it applies to the creation of new species, is based on the Secular Humanism religious position held by athiests and agnostics, that new species were created by the same natural process as the evolution of a species to adapt to its environment, even though the former has never been proven, like the later has.<BR/><BR/>Intelligent Design embraces evolution as far as the adaptation of a species to changes in its environment, but it postulates the existence of an Intelligent Designer, such as a supreme being, for the creation of new species.<BR/><BR/>As far as ID is concerned, Creation Science is one possible explanation for the creation of new species, just as Evolution is acceptable for the adaptation of a species to its environment.</B><BR/><BR/><I>Even the concept of Intelligent Design, which claims that the design in nature is scientific proof of a designer, is Creation Science in disguise.</I><BR/><BR/><B>I disagree. Creation Science requires a 6 day creation period. ID does not.</B><BR/><BR/><I>On the other hand, Evolutionists are dead wrong when they claim that the natural world can only be understood from an evolutionary perspective. Creationists can stand firm on the reality of scripture, and rid science of religious presuppositions by attacking the scientific merit of evolution, rather than promoting creationism.</I><BR/><BR/><B>I can see an ID proponent doing that, but a Creationist is very wedded to the literal interpretation of Genesis</B>Don Singletonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02991386635454877389noreply@blogger.com